Initial Computations for

The Single Photon Philosophical Telescope

  1. Let's look at the solar light flux as a starting place: The Solar Output is the rate of energy release by the Sun 3.83E+33 erg/sec
  2. From spherical geometry, the energy density at the earth's orbit is the Solar Constant 1.37E+06 erg/cm2*sec
  3. 40% of the Sun's energy is visible light 5.48E+05 erg/cm2*sec
  4. The energy of typical visible light photon is determined from E=hv (1) 4.00E-12 erg/photon
  5. So the visible solar flux is 1.37E+17 photon/cm2*sec
  6. 70% of visible light gets through the atmosphere when viewed at the zenith (2) 9.59E+16 photon/cm2*sec
  7. Therefore 100 thousand million million photons blast away at every square centimeter of the surface of the earth. This partially explains sunburn.
  8. Now let's apply these facts to the observation of a more remote star. Tau Ceti is dimmer than the sun (0.45 as bright)
  9. The light flux of Tau Ceti on an earth-like planet 1 AU from the star 4.32E+16 photon/cm2*sec
  10. The distance of Tau Ceti from the earth is 10.8 light years (or to relate to Solar distance 6.80E+05 AU)
  11. Since light diminishes in intensity as the square of distance, viewing Tau Ceti from our earth gives Tau Ceti's flux as 9.32E+04 photon/cm2*sec
  12. This is one millionth of a millionth of the Sun's light. And yet, we can see Tau Ceti with our naked eyes.
  13. The amount of light from an earthlike planet as a fraction of it's star's output (3) 1.00E-09 (This is the shakiest assumption)
  14. IF Tau Ceti had a planet, it's light flux is 9.32E-05 photon/cm2*sec
  15. We would have to wait a long time for one of these photons to hit a square centimeter: 10727 seconds or 3.0 hours
  16. Our eyes are 0.5 cm in aperture so naked eye observing would wait 7.6 hours
  17. This is not much light so let's use some astronomical equipment to help
  18. 50 mm binoculars capture a bunch more light - 39.3 cm2
  19. So light headed for both eyes is 3.66E-03 photon/sec
  20. 75% of light makes it through binoculars (4) 2.75E-03 photon/sec
  21. 1% of photons entering the eye fire a neuron (this is the quantum efficiency of the eye) so the rate of "photon seeing" is (5) 2.75E-05 photon/sec
  22. To reliabily assume that you have seen a photon from Tau Ceti's planet, you have to look for 36423 seconds or 10 hours
  23. This would be pretty boring so let's try a bigger telescope.
  24. 10 inch newtonian reflector receives more light (517 cm2)
  25. The secondary blocks some of the light (486 cm2)
  26. So the light headed for one eye is 4.53E-02 photon/sec
  27. 70% of the light bounces through the mirrors so the amount that gets to the eye is 3.17E-02 photon/sec due to relectivity losses (6)
  28. 1% of photons entering the eye fire a neuron (3.17E-04 photon/sec)
  29. To reliabily assume that you have seen a photon from Tau Ceti's planet, you have to look for 3154 seconds or 53 minutes
  30. If Tau Ceti had 5 planets, you only have to look for 11 minutes
  31. Now this is only one possibly likely star. Let's look at lots of stars
  32. M31, The Great Galaxy in Andromeda is 2.20E+06 light year away or 1.39E+11 AU
  33. M31 glows with the light of 1.1E+10 suns
  34. Its light flux on the surface of the earth is 5.49E+04 photon/cm2*sec
  35. Peeking through our 10 inch telescope, we "see" 1.87E+05 photon/sec
  36. IF every visible star had a planet like the earth or every fifth star had 5 planets the light from M31's planets would be 1.87E-04 photon/sec
  37. To reliabily assume that you have seen a photon from M31's planets, you have to look for 5354 seconds or 89 minutes
  38. This is a long time. How about we try a philosophical telescope with is only naked flesh? Wearing only shorts, my exposed skin area is 600 sq inches or 3871 cm2
  39. This is the same area as a telescope of aperture 27.6 inches
  40. The visible light from M31 hitting this body is 2.13E+08 photons/sec
  41. Since we are talking contact, not vision, we can assume more of the radiation is recieived than just visible - 80%
  42. So the photon flux from M31 is 4.25E+08 photons/sec and from the planets: 2.35 sec/photon Relative to the eye and 10" telescope, it is 2276 times as efficient
  43. Adapting the Frank Drake Equation to our case:
      Number of stars visible in M31		1.1E+10 stars
      Fraction of stars which live long enough	0.500 	
      Average number of planets per star		10 planets
      Fraction of planets suitable for life		0.025 	
      Fraction of suitable planets where life rises	0.500 	
      Fraction of suitable planets w/ intelligence	0.500 	
      Avg life of visible evidence of intelligence	1.0E+07  years
      Estimated galaxy lifetime			1E+10 	years
    
  44. Visible number of planets with civilizations: 343750 planets
  45. The light of M31's civilized planets hitting me is: 1.33E-05 photons/sec
  46. Or my body receives 75269 sec/photon or 21 hours/photon
  47. What if we add persons?
    If we had	10 	people			125 	minutes/photon
    		100 				 13 	minutes/photon
    		1,000 				 75 	seconds/photon
    		10,000 				  8 	seconds/photon
    
  48. Can photons have bounced off creations of intelligence? From a planet like ours, most light is clouds (99%), therefore, 1% is surface.
  49. The fraction of light from the surface which touched intelligent creations (roads buildings beings etc) is 1%
  50. Therefore, of the light coming off an inhabited planet, only a fraction has contacted intelligent life 0.0001
  51. What if we add persons?
    If we had	10 	people			871 	days/photon
    		100 				 87 	days/photon
    		1,000 				209 	hours/photon
    		10,000 				 21 	hours/photon
    		100,000 			125 	minutes/photon
    

Footnotes: (1) I assumed an average frequency at the middle of the visible band, 5000 Angstroms. (2) From Sidgwicke, Amateur Astronomer's Handbook (3) From Sagan et. al. (4) From Sidgewicke, I assumed a coated refractor with a few extra reflective surfaces (5) Al Kelly comment that the quantum efficiency of the eye is about 1%, where some CCD's have 50%. (6) From Sidgewicke -- the appropriate losses
For more information about this:
The Big Idea | Calculations | The Institute | Demonstration
Return to SPPT Institute Home Page

Copyright © 1993, Dennis Webb (denjwebb@aol.com).
This page built November 11, 1997.
Visitors since November 28, 1997: